No association between protein C levels and bacteremia in children with febrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about protein C levels and outcomes of pediatric febrile neutropenia. The primary aim was to evaluate the relationship between markers of activated coagulation including protein C levels and bacteremia in pediatric oncology patients with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we collected a blood specimen from pediatric oncology patients who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital between October 2, 2002 and February 3, 2006 with febrile neutropenia. Levels of protein C, soluble thrombomodulin, soluble endothelial protein C receptor, thrombin-antithrombin complex, fibrinogen degradation products and activated protein C were measured. Associations between markers of activated coagulation and bacteremia were examined using univariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 73 evaluable patients, 10 had bacteremia. None of the above measured markers of activated coagulation were associated with bacteremia. More specifically, the median level of protein C in those with bacteremia was 0.64 U/mL (interquartile range: 0.58 to 0.72) in comparison with the median level in those without bacteremia of 0.73 U/mL (interquartile range: 0.61 to 0.92), odds ratio 0.18 (95% confidence interval 0.00 to 8.33); P=0.38. CONCLUSIONS: Protein C levels do not differ between pediatric febrile neutropenic patients with and without bacteremia.

A meta-analysis of the effect of antibody therapy for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this meta-analytic study was to determine the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related hospitalization. Secondary objectives were to determine if antibody therapy decreases the risk of RSV infection, intensive care admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in high risk infant populations. METHODS: We performed searches of electronic data bases from 1966 to April 2009. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) There was randomization between polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies and placebo or no therapy, and 2) Polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies were given as prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the six included studies, three utilized RSV-IGIV (total of 533 randomized to treatment groups) and three utilized palivizumab (total of 1,663 randomized to treatment groups). The absolute risk of hospitalization in the control arms was 12% and overall RR for all 2,196 children who received one of the antibody products was 0.53 (95% CI 0.43, 0.66), P < 0.00001. When looking only at the children who received palivizumab, the RR for hospitalization was 0.50 (95% CI 0.38, 0.66), P < 0.00001. For the children receiving RSV-IGIV, the RR for hospitalization was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42, 0.83, P < 0.002). The use of palivizumab resulted in a significant decrease in admission to the ICU (RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.14, 0.59; P = 0.0007). There was no significant reduction in the risk of mechanical ventilation or mortality with the use of antibody prophylaxis. Infants born at less than 35 weeks gestational age, and those with chronic lung and congenital heart disease all had a significant reduction in the risk of RSV hospitalization with children born under 35 weeks gestational age showing a trend towards the greatest benefit. CONCLUSION: Both palivizumab and RSV-IGIV decrease the incidence of RSV hospitalization and ICU admission and their effect appears to be qualitatively similarly. There was neither a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of mechanical ventilation nor in all cause mortality. This meta-analysis separately quantifies the impact of RSV-IGIV and palivizumab on various measures of severe RSV disease and builds upon a previous study that was only able to examine the pooled effect of all antibody products together.

Herpes simplex virus in febrile neutropenic children undergoing chemotherapy for cancer: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of oral herpes simplex virus (HSV) as detected by polymerase chain reaction, in pediatric oncology patients with febrile neutropenia. Our secondary objectives were to describe the association between oral HSV and prolonged fever, neutropenia, mucositis, and response to initial antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we obtained a mouth swab and blood specimen from oncology patients with febrile neutropenia, and tested them for HSV by polymerase chain reaction. Prolonged fever was defined as the presence of fever 48 hours after initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Of the 75 oral and blood specimens obtained, only 7 oral swabs (9%) and 2 blood samples (3%) were positive for HSV. Oral HSV was not associated with prolonged fever or neutropenia. However, oral HSV was associated with longer median duration of mucositis (8 days; interquartile range, 0-12 days) compared with negative episodes (0 days; interquartile range, 0-2.5 days); P = 0.005. Oral HSV also was associated with inferior successful response to initial antimicrobial therapy (1 of 7, 14.3%) compared with negative episodes (51 of 67, 76.1%); P = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HSV infection in pediatric oncology patients with febrile neutropenia was low and was not associated with prolonged fever. However, oral HSV was associated with prolonged mucositis and poorer response to initial therapy. It is unknown whether early intervention with acyclovir can alter these associations.